Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2017-2019Oklahoma
CeeDee Lamb
WR • 6'2" • 191 lbs • Richmond, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
CeeDee Lamb reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92
Consistency
64.4
Season Value
70.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
CeeDee Lamb, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oklahoma. CeeDee Lamb reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 1,327 primary output with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
102.1
Efficiency
92
Usage
27
Consistency
64.4
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 119. Houston: 46. Unknown: 144. UCLA: 39. Texas Tech: 185. Kansas: 25. Texas: 171. West Virginia: 71. Kansas State: 135. Iowa State: 167. TCU: 16. Oklahoma State: 36. Baylor: 173
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 4 by 100. Houston: 2 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. UCLA: 1 by 100. Texas Tech: 7 by 100. Kansas: 2 by 83.3. Texas: 10 by 100. West Virginia: 3 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 100. Iowa State: 8 by 100. TCU: 2 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 4 by 60. Baylor: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins92.9 · n=10 · -34.1 vs Losses
Losses127 · n=2 · +34.1 vs Wins
First Half104.1 · n=7 · +4.5 vs Second Half
Second Half99.7 · n=6 · -4.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ LSU100 receiving yards | L 28-63 | — | 4 | 119 | 29.8 | 29.80 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Baylor100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-23 | — | 8 | 173 | 19.4 | 21.60 | 0 | 71 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Oklahoma State | W 34-16 | — | 4 | 36 | 7.3 | 9 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs TCU | W 28-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 12.3 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-41 | — | 8 | 167 | 20.9 | 20.90 | 2 | 63 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards | L 41-48 | — | 5 | 135 | 21.7 | 27 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs West Virginia | W 52-14 | — | 3 | 71 | 20 | 23.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-27 | — | 10 | 171 | 15.9 | 17.10 | 3 | 51 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Kansas | W 45-20 | — | 2 | 25 | 1.7 | 12.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 55-16 | — | 7 | 185 | 26.4 | 26.40 | 3 | 71 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ UCLA | W 48-14 | — | 1 | 39 | 20 | 39 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 144 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 48 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Houston | W 49-31 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 45 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma | 807 | 84.7 | 16.7 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 807 | 84.7 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,155 | 87.8 | 24 | 348 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,155 | 87.8 | 24 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,327 | 92 | 27 | 172 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,327 | 92 | 27 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas Tech
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
173
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
167
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
167 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
185
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
185 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
1,327 primary output · 92 efficiency · 27 usage
70.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Oklahoma
70.9
1,327 primary · 92 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
65.3
1,155 primary · 87.8 efficiency · 24 usage
Milestones
14
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9358
Foster · Richmond, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,289
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.