Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2017-2021Baylor
Jalen Pitre
S • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Stafford, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jalen Pitre shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
43.7
Consistency
52.4
Season Value
38.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Baylor
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Pitre, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Baylor. Jalen Pitre shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Baylor paired 19.5 primary output with 49.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 43.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Loss with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Baylor
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
43.7
Usage
14
Consistency
52.4
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 2. Texas State: 4. Unknown: 2. Kansas: 1. Iowa State: 0.5. Oklahoma State: 0.5. West Virginia: 1. BYU: 3.5. Texas: 3. TCU: 6. Oklahoma: 1.5. Kansas State: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Oklahoma State: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 5 by 40.8. Texas State: 5 by 60.8. Unknown: 6 by 45. Kansas: 4 by 26.7. Iowa State: 8 by 38.3. Oklahoma State: 4 by 21.7. West Virginia: 5 by 30.8. BYU: 10 by 76.7. Texas: 2 by 38.3. TCU: 6 by 75. Oklahoma: 5 by 35.8. Kansas State: 2 by 18.3. Texas Tech: 6 by 35. Oklahoma State: 7 by 69.2
Split Comparison
Wins2.0 · n=11 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses3.3 · n=2 · +1.2 vs Wins
First Half1.6 · n=7 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.9 · n=7 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
76.7 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/2 | @ Ole Miss | W 21-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Oklahoma StateSplash game | W 21-16 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Texas Tech | W 27-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Kansas State | W 20-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Oklahoma | W 27-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ TCUSplash game | L 28-30 | 6 | 5 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Texas | W 31-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs BYU10+ tackles · Splash game | W 38-24 | 10 | 9 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs West Virginia | W 45-20 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Iowa State | W 31-29 | 8 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Kansas | W 45-7 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Texas StateSplash game | W 29-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Baylor
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Baylor | 5 | 17 | 4.6 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Baylor | 2 | 10.3 | 3.4 | -3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Baylor | 2.5 | 18.7 | 3.7 | 0.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Baylor | 19.5 | 49.4 | 19.6 | 17 |
| 2021 Postseason | Baylor | 31 | 43.7 | 14 | 11.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Baylor | 31 | 43.7 | 14 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
TCU
Loss with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 66.5 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma
5
Primary metric
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.5 takeover score.
#4
BYU
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#5
Texas State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Baylor
19.5 primary output · 49.4 efficiency · 19.6 usage
39.6
#2
2021 Postseason · Baylor
38.5
31 primary · 43.7 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Baylor
38.5
31 primary · 43.7 efficiency · 14 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
9
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8877
Notre Dame · Lawrenceville, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
194
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.