Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2018-2021Georgia Southern
Logan Wright
RB • 6'0" • 230 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Logan Wright leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
48.2
Consistency
42.8
Season Value
53.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
1819202021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Georgia Southern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Logan Wright, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Georgia Southern. Logan Wright leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.2 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Georgia Southern paired 973 primary output with 48.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Win with 214 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
81.1
Efficiency
48.2
Usage
24.3
Consistency
42.8
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 181. Florida Atlantic: 29. Arkansas: 52. Louisiana: 110. Arkansas State: 214. Troy: -3. South Alabama: 60. Georgia State: 153. Coastal Carolina: 35. Texas State: 27. BYU: 93. App State: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 27 by 70.5. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 75.5. Arkansas: 11 by 45.4. Louisiana: 12 by 57.7. Arkansas State: 10 by 100. Troy: 11 by 0. South Alabama: 14 by 44.6. Georgia State: 22 by 64.3. Coastal Carolina: 10 by 36.5. Texas State: 12 by 23.4. BYU: 19 by 42.7. App State: 15 by 18.2
Split Comparison
Wins120.5 · n=2 · +59.3 vs Losses
Losses61.2 · n=9 · -59.3 vs Wins
First Half97.2 · n=6 · +32.2 vs Second Half
Second Half65 · n=6 · -32.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ App State | L 3-27 | 14 | 27 | 1.90 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 1.5 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs BYU2+ TD | L 17-34 | 14 | 50 | 3.60 | 2 | 5 | 43 | 4.9 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Texas State | W 38-30 | 12 | 27 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 8-28 | 10 | 35 | 3.50 | 0 | — | — | 3.5 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Georgia State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 14-21 | 20 | 113 | 5.70 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 7.0 |
| Thu 10/14 | @ South Alabama | L 14-41 | 14 | 60 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Troy | L 24-27 | 9 | -1 | -0.10 | 1 | 2 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Arkansas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 59-33 | 10 | 214 | 21.40 | 2 | — | — | 21.4 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Louisiana | L 20-28 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 0 | 4 | 85 | 9.2 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Arkansas | L 10-45 | 9 | 37 | 4.10 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 6-38 | 4 | 29 | 7.30 | 1 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | — | 26 | 177 | 6.80 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Southern
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019202020202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 308 | 45.8 | 8.2 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 301 | 58.8 | 20.8 | -7 |
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 735 | 55.3 | 14.1 | 434 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 735 | 55.3 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 973 | 48.2 | 24.3 | 238 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Win with 214 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
214
Primary metric
214 scrimmage yards and 18.9 usage.
#2
Georgia State
143
Primary metric
Loss with 143 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
143 scrimmage yards and 15.1 usage.
#3
New Mexico State
136
Primary metric
Win with 136 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
136 scrimmage yards and 26.2 usage.
#4
Unknown
114
Primary metric
Game with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114 scrimmage yards and 26.8 usage.
#5
Unknown
181
Primary metric
Game driven by a workhorse rushing load.
181 scrimmage yards and 35.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
973 primary output · 48.2 efficiency · 24.3 usage
53.6
#2
2020 Postseason · Georgia Southern
48.3
735 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
48.3
735 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 14.1 usage
Milestones
9
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7953
Screven County · Sylvania, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia Southern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,317
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.