Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
App State paired 763 primary output with 74.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | App State | 12 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 72.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | App State | 12 | 44 | 556 | 7 | 72.7 |
| 2018 Postseason | App State | 13 | 3 | 45 | 1 | 52.6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | App State | 13 | 26 | 282 | 2 | 52.6 |
| 2019 Postseason | App State | 14 | 3 | 50 | 2 | 81 |
| 2019 Regular Season | App State | 14 | 57 | 713 | 4 | 81 |
| 2020 Postseason | App State | 12 | 2 | 45 | 0 | 74.8 |
| 2020 Regular Season | App State | 12 | 45 | 571 | 3 | 74.8 |
| 2021 Postseason | App State | 14 | 5 | 47 | 0 | 77.7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | App State | 14 | 55 | 776 | 6 | 77.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
App State paired 763 primary output with 74.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
58.8
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
24.5
Consistency
53
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 47. East Carolina: 114. Miami: 28. Elon: 18. Marshall: 123. Georgia State: 43. Louisiana: 25. Coastal Carolina: 23. UL Monroe: 29. Arkansas State: 69. South Alabama: 37. Troy: 85. Georgia Southern: 111. Louisiana: 71
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 5 by 62.7. East Carolina: 4 by 100. Miami: 3 by 62.2. Elon: 3 by 40. Marshall: 9 by 91.1. Georgia State: 4 by 71.7. Louisiana: 2 by 83.3. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 4 by 48.3. Arkansas State: 4 by 100. South Alabama: 5 by 49.3. Troy: 7 by 81. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. Louisiana: 6 by 78.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.