Usage Score
4.5
Player Dossier
2017-2019Texas A&M
Debione Renfro
DB • 6'2" • 198 lbs • Pearland, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Debione Renfro shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.9
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
22.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Debione Renfro, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Texas A&M. Debione Renfro shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 7 primary output with 18.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
18.9
Usage
4.5
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 1. Unknown: 2. Auburn: 1. Arkansas: 0. Alabama: 0. Ole Miss: 1. Mississippi State: 0. UTSA: 1. South Carolina: 0. Georgia: 0. LSU: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 5 by 40.8. Auburn: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 4 by 16.7. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 3 by 22.5. Mississippi State: 3 by 12.5. UTSA: 2 by 18.3. South Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Georgia: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=6 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=6 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=5 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Oklahoma State | W 24-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ LSU | L 7-50 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Georgia | L 13-19 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs South Carolina | W 30-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-30 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas | W 31-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn | L 20-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 7 | 24.2 | 3.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 24.2 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 7 | 20.4 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 20.4 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 7 | 18.9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 18.9 | 4.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#3
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.6 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.9 takeover score.
#5
LSU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
7 primary output · 18.9 efficiency · 4.5 usage
22.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
22.8
7 primary · 18.9 efficiency · 4.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
22.4
7 primary · 24.2 efficiency · 3.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8689
Creighton Prep · Omaha, NE
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
123
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.