Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2017-2020Texas A&M
Anthony Hines III
LB • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Plano, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Anthony Hines III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
31.5
Consistency
37.4
Season Value
23.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
171718191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Hines III, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Anthony Hines III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
31.5
Usage
10.1
Consistency
37.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 0. Texas State: 0.5. Clemson: 0. Unknown: 0. Auburn: 1. Arkansas: 0.5. Alabama: 1. Ole Miss: 0. Mississippi State: 0.5. UTSA: 1.5. South Carolina: 2.5. Georgia: 2. LSU: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 3 by 12.5. Texas State: 4 by 21.7. Clemson: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 6 by 35. Arkansas: 5 by 25.8. Alabama: 6 by 35. Ole Miss: 5 by 20.8. Mississippi State: 6 by 30. UTSA: 6 by 40. South Carolina: 6 by 50. Georgia: 7 by 49.2. LSU: 12 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=7 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=5 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
60 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Oklahoma State | W 24-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ LSU10+ tackles | L 7-50 | 12 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ GeorgiaSplash game | L 13-19 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 30-6 | 6 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-30 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas | W 31-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn | L 20-28 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Texas State | W 41-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 9 | 22.8 | 6.2 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 9 | 22.8 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | 0 | -9 |
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 10.5 | 31.5 | 10.1 | 10.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 10.5 | 31.5 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -10.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
#2
Louisiana
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.6 takeover score.
#3
Florida
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#4
Georgia
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#5
LSU
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
33.3
#2
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
23.5
10.5 primary · 31.5 efficiency · 10.1 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
23.5
10.5 primary · 31.5 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9691
Plano East · Plano, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
106
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.