Player Stats

Hezekiah Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
325
Receptions
35

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTexas A&M0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonTexas A&M1213044.6
2018 PostseasonTexas A&M6-0061.2
2018 Regular SeasonTexas A&M615134061.2
2019 Regular SeasonTexas A&M0-00-
2020 PostseasonTexas A&M6233066.9
2020 Regular SeasonTexas A&M616145066.9
2021 Regular SeasonTexas A&M0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Texas A&M paired 178 primary output with 66.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 66.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Texas A&M

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

29.7

Efficiency

66.5

Usage

15

Consistency

51.4

Best Game by takeover score

Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 33. Arkansas: 47. South Carolina: 12. LSU: 9. Auburn: 11. Tennessee: 66

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 5 by 62.7. South Carolina: 2 by 40. LSU: 1 by 60. Auburn: 1 by 73.3. Tennessee: 7 by 62.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half30.7 · Games = 3 · +2 vs Second Half
Second Half28.7 · Games = 3 · -2 vs First Half