Usage Score
23.4
Player Dossier
2017-2020Texas A&M
Jhamon Ausbon
WR • 6'2" • 225 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jhamon Ausbon reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.9
Consistency
74.9
Season Value
70.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
17171818191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jhamon Ausbon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Texas A&M. Jhamon Ausbon reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 872 primary output with 81.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.1
Efficiency
81.9
Usage
23.4
Consistency
74.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 10. Texas State: 75. Clemson: 69. Unknown: 109. Auburn: 111. Arkansas: 82. Alabama: 60. Ole Miss: 47. Mississippi State: 55. UTSA: 90. South Carolina: 46. Georgia: 96. LSU: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 66.7. Texas State: 6 by 83.3. Clemson: 7 by 65.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Auburn: 8 by 92.5. Arkansas: 7 by 78.1. Alabama: 5 by 80. Ole Miss: 5 by 62.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 91.7. UTSA: 5 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 100. Georgia: 9 by 71.1. LSU: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins57.9 · n=7 · -13.7 vs Losses
Losses71.6 · n=5 · +13.7 vs Wins
First Half73.7 · n=7 · +14.4 vs Second Half
Second Half59.3 · n=6 · -14.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Oklahoma State | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ LSU | L 7-50 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ GeorgiaHigh volume | L 13-19 | — | 9 | 96 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs South Carolina | W 30-6 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-30 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-17 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas | W 31-27 | — | 7 | 82 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-28 | — | 8 | 111 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 4 | 109 | 27.3 | 27.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Texas State | W 41-7 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 571 | 76.3 | 20.7 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 571 | 76.3 | 20.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 367 | 77.3 | 17.9 | -204 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 367 | 77.3 | 17.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 872 | 81.9 | 23.4 | 505 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 872 | 81.9 | 23.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -872 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 92.5 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
81
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
109
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
872 primary output · 81.9 efficiency · 23.4 usage
70.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
70.1
872 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 23.4 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
54
571 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 20.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9648
IMG Academy · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,810
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.