Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2018-2021North Carolina
Jeremiah Gemmel
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Newnan, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jeremiah Gemmel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.9
Consistency
33.4
Season Value
22.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · North Carolina
18191920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- North Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremiah Gemmel, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · North Carolina. Jeremiah Gemmel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
North Carolina paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · North Carolina
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
32.9
Usage
8.2
Consistency
33.4
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Georgia State: 0. Virginia: 1. Georgia Tech: 0.5. Duke: 1.5. Florida State: 0. Miami: 3. Notre Dame: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Pittsburgh: 4. Unknown: 1. NC State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Virginia Tech: 7 by 29.2. Georgia State: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 5 by 30.8. Georgia Tech: 8 by 38.3. Duke: 5 by 35.8. Florida State: 3 by 12.5. Miami: 9 by 67.5. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8. Wake Forest: 4 by 16.7. Pittsburgh: 10 by 81.7. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. NC State: 10 by 51.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.1 · n=5 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · -1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · n=6 · +1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/30 | @ South Carolina | L 21-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | @ NC State10+ tackles | L 30-34 | 10 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/12 | @ Pittsburgh10+ tackles · Splash game | L 23-30 | 10 | 8 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Wake Forest | W 58-55 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Notre Dame | L 34-44 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Miami | W 45-42 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Florida State | L 25-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Duke | W 38-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Georgia Tech | L 22-45 | 8 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Virginia | W 59-39 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Georgia State | W 59-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Virginia Tech | L 10-17 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Carolina
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | North Carolina | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | North Carolina | 12 | 35.5 | 8.6 | 12 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Carolina | 12 | 35.5 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | North Carolina | 13.5 | 38.3 | 8.6 | 1.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | North Carolina | 13.5 | 38.3 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | North Carolina | 12 | 32.9 | 8.2 | -1.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | North Carolina | 12 | 32.9 | 8.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69.4 takeover score.
#2
Duke
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.8 takeover score.
#3
Syracuse
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.7 takeover score.
#4
Miami
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#5
Miami
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · North Carolina
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2020 Postseason · North Carolina
28.2
13.5 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · North Carolina
28.2
13.5 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 8.6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.894
Mill Creek · Hoschton, GA
- Committed To
- Syracuse
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
237
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.