Usage Score
5.5
Player Dossier
2017-2021Miami
Amari Carter
S • 6'2" • 202 lbs • Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Amari Carter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.2
Consistency
31.8
Season Value
17.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Miami
17171819192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Miami
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amari Carter, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Miami. Amari Carter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Miami paired 7 primary output with 24 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 24.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: App State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Miami
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
24.2
Usage
5.5
Consistency
31.8
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0.5. App State: 2. Michigan State: 0.5. North Carolina: 1.5. NC State: 0. Pittsburgh: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Florida State: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Duke: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 21.7. App State: 7 by 49.2. Michigan State: 5 by 25.8. North Carolina: 8 by 48.3. NC State: 5 by 20.8. Pittsburgh: 5 by 20.8. Georgia Tech: 3 by 12.5. Florida State: 3 by 12.5. Virginia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Duke: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 4 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · Games = 5 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
App State
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs App State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Duke | W 47-10 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/21 | vs Virginia Tech | W 38-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Florida State | L 28-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Georgia Tech | W 33-30 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Pittsburgh | W 38-34 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs NC State | W 31-30 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ North Carolina | L 42-45 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Michigan State | L 17-38 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs App StateSplash game | W 25-23 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Alabama | L 13-44 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182019201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Miami | 4 | 12.4 | 2.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Miami | 4 | 12.4 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Miami | 7 | 24 | 4 | 3 |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami | 4.5 | 15 | 3.6 | -2.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami | 4.5 | 15 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami | 1 | 25.7 | 4.2 | -3.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami | 5.5 | 24.2 | 5.5 | 4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#2
App State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#3
NC State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Florida State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.9 takeover score.
#5
Clemson
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Miami
7 primary output · 24 efficiency · 4 usage
21.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Miami
17.9
5.5 primary · 24.2 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Miami
8.8
4.5 primary · 15 efficiency · 3.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9085
Lakeridge · Lake Oswego, OR
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
163
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.