Player Dossier

2017-2021

Miami

Mike Harley

WR • 5'11" • 182 lbs • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Mike Harley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

19.7

Efficiency

66.7

Consistency

72.8

Season Value

58.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Miami

17171819202021

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Miami
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Mike Harley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Miami. Mike Harley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Mike Harley played WR for Miami. Across 5 tracked seasons, Mike Harley recorded 36 rushing yards, 2,158 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Miami.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Miami paired 799 primary output with 77.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Miami

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

45.3

Efficiency

66.7

Usage

19.7

Consistency

72.8

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 23. App State: 27. Michigan State: 51. Unknown: 47. Virginia: 45. North Carolina: 36. NC State: 21. Pittsburgh: 53. Georgia Tech: 38. Florida State: 41. Virginia Tech: 65. Duke: 96

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 3 by 51.1. App State: 5 by 36. Michigan State: 4 by 85. Unknown: 4 by 78.3. Virginia: 6 by 50. North Carolina: 3 by 80. NC State: 2 by 70. Pittsburgh: 5 by 70.7. Georgia Tech: 3 by 84.4. Florida State: 6 by 45.6. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. Duke: 13 by 49.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins50 · Games = 6 · +10.8 vs Losses
Losses39.2 · Games = 5 · -10.8 vs Wins
First Half38.2 · Games = 6 · -14.2 vs Second Half
Second Half52.3 · Games = 6 · +14.2 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Duke

Best efficiency game

100 vs Virginia Tech

Result
Sat 11/27@ DukeHigh volumeW 47-1013967.47.40026
Sun 11/21vs Virginia TechW 38-2636521.721.70155
Sat 11/13@ Florida StateL 28-316416.86.80112
Sat 11/6vs Georgia TechW 33-3033812.712.70124
Sat 10/30@ PittsburghW 38-3455310.610.60020
Sat 10/23vs NC StateW 31-3022110.510.50022
Sat 10/16@ North CarolinaL 42-453361212025
Thu 9/30vs VirginiaL 28-306457.57.50116
Sat 9/25vs Unknown44711.811.80116
Sat 9/18vs Michigan StateL 17-3845110.412.80027
Sat 9/11vs App StateW 25-235275.45.40012
Sat 9/4vs AlabamaL 13-443237.77.70017

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Miami

    2017-2021

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2017201720182019202020202021
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2017 PostseasonMiami9162.27.2
2017 Regular SeasonMiami9162.27.20
2018 Regular SeasonMiami24054.519.7149
2019 Regular SeasonMiami48575.416.7245
2020 PostseasonMiami79977.123.3314
2020 Regular SeasonMiami79977.123.30
2021 Regular SeasonMiami54366.719.7-256

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Virginia

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

170

Primary metric

170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Louisville

116

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

North Carolina

70

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

NC State

153

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Florida International

76

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

76 receiving yards with a 72.4 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2020 Postseason · Miami

799 primary output · 77.1 efficiency · 23.3 usage

62.8

#2

2020 Regular Season · Miami

62.8

799 primary · 77.1 efficiency · 23.3 usage

#3

2021 Regular Season · Miami

58.2

543 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 19.7 usage

Milestones

4

100+ receiving yards

4

8+ catch outings

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2017 · Rating 0.8969

St. Thomas Aquinas · Fort Lauderdale, FL

Committed To
Miami
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2017

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

2,158

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.