Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2017-2019Iowa
Geno Stone
DB • 5'10" • 210 lbs • New Castle, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Geno Stone shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.4
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
16.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Iowa
171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Iowa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Geno Stone, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Iowa. Geno Stone shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Iowa paired 8 primary output with 20.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Iowa
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
29.4
Usage
7.4
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Rutgers: 0. Iowa State: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0. Michigan: 2. Penn State: 0. Purdue: 0. Northwestern: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Minnesota: 1. Illinois: 3. Nebraska: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 5 by 30.8. Miami (OH): 2 by 8.3. Rutgers: 4 by 16.7. Iowa State: 8 by 43.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Michigan: 4 by 36.7. Penn State: 6 by 25. Purdue: 6 by 25. Northwestern: 7 by 39.2. Wisconsin: 6 by 25. Minnesota: 8 by 43.3. Illinois: 4 by 46.7. Nebraska: 8 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 10 · +0.0 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · -0.0 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs USC | W 49-24 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Nebraska | W 27-24 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs IllinoisSplash game | W 19-10 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Minnesota | W 23-19 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Wisconsin | L 22-24 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Northwestern | W 20-0 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Purdue | W 26-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Penn State | L 12-17 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Michigan | L 3-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 48-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Iowa State | W 18-17 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Rutgers | W 30-0 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Miami (OH) | W 38-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Iowa | 1 | 11.6 | 4.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Iowa | 1 | 11.6 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Iowa | 8 | 20.2 | 5.2 | 7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Iowa | 8 | 20.2 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Iowa | 9 | 29.4 | 7.4 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Iowa | 9 | 29.4 | 7.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.5 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#3
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.5 takeover score.
#4
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.9 takeover score.
#5
Michigan
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Iowa
8 primary output · 20.2 efficiency · 5.2 usage
19.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Iowa
19.8
8 primary · 20.2 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Iowa
16.5
9 primary · 29.4 efficiency · 7.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7993
New Castle · New Castle, PA
- Committed To
- Iowa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
126
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.