Player Stats

Drew Jordan College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
114
TFL
16.5
Sacks
11
QB hurries
14
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonDuke101-0--039.9
2017 Regular SeasonDuke1015332-039.9
2018 PostseasonDuke8511--050.8
2018 Regular SeasonDuke82831.53-050.8
2019 Regular SeasonDuke11183.516-046.6
2020 Regular SeasonDuke10293.53.5--050
2021 PostseasonMichigan State111-0--039.6
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan State11172.5131039.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Duke paired 9.5 primary output with 29.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 13.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Duke, Michigan State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Michigan State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

13.7

Usage

4

Consistency

39.6

Best Game by takeover score

Purdue

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 0. Northwestern: 0. Miami: 1. Nebraska: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Rutgers: 0. Michigan: 0. Purdue: 2. Maryland: 0.5. Ohio State: 1.5. Penn State: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2. Northwestern: 2 by 8.3. Miami: 1 by 14.2. Nebraska: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 3 by 22.5. Rutgers: 4 by 16.7. Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Purdue: 1 by 24.2. Maryland: 1 by 9.2. Ohio State: 1 by 19.2. Penn State: 1 by 19.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 9 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · Games = 2 · +1.3 vs Wins