Usage Score
25.7
Player Dossier
2018-2021Wake Forest
WR • 6'1" • 182 lbs • Murfreesboro, NC, USA
Jaquarii Roberson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.7
Efficiency
84.8
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
69.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaquarii Roberson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Wake Forest. Jaquarii Roberson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jaquarii Roberson played WR for Wake Forest. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jaquarii Roberson recorded 8 rushing yards, 2,158 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 926 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
82.9
Efficiency
84.8
Usage
25.7
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Old Dominion: 46. Unknown: 97. Florida State: 11. Virginia: 91. Louisville: 135. Syracuse: 135. Army: 157. Duke: 65. North Carolina: 111. NC State: 12. Clemson: 93. Boston College: 71. Pittsburgh: 54
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Old Dominion: 6 by 51.1. Unknown: 4 by 100. Florida State: 2 by 36.7. Virginia: 4 by 100. Louisville: 6 by 100. Syracuse: 9 by 100. Army: 8 by 100. Duke: 4 by 100. North Carolina: 7 by 100. NC State: 1 by 80. Clemson: 6 by 100. Boston College: 5 by 94.7. Pittsburgh: 9 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/5 | vs PittsburghHigh volume | L 21-45 | — | 9 | 54 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Boston College | W 41-10 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Clemson | L 27-48 | — | 6 | 93 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs NC State | W 45-42 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ North Carolina100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 55-58 | — | 7 | 111 | 15.9 | 15.90 | 2 | 26 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Duke | W 45-7 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Army100 receiving yards · High volume | W 70-56 | — | 8 | 157 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 3 | 75 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-37 | — | 9 | 135 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards | W 37-34 | — | 6 | 135 | 17.9 | 22.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Fri 9/24 | @ Virginia | W 37-17 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Florida State | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 1 | 64 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Old Dominion | W 42-10 | — | 6 | 46 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 74 | 52.2 | 11 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 74 | 52.2 | 11 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Wake Forest | 80 | 63.3 | 7 | 6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 80 | 63.3 | 7 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Wake Forest | 926 | 87.3 | 35.8 | 846 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 926 | 87.3 | 35.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1,078 | 84.8 | 25.7 | 152 |
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
138
Primary metric
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
157
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
157 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Carolina
167
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
167 receiving yards with a 92.8 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Wake Forest
926 primary output · 87.3 efficiency · 35.8 usage
70.4
#2
2020 Regular Season · Wake Forest
70.4
926 primary · 87.3 efficiency · 35.8 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Wake Forest
69.6
1,078 primary · 84.8 efficiency · 25.7 usage
9
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8739
Middle Tennessee Christian School · Murfreesboro, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,158
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.