Player Stats

Aaron Hackett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
332
Receptions
42
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonSyracuse0-00-
2018 PostseasonSyracuse3342029.4
2018 Regular SeasonSyracuse311129.4
2019 Regular SeasonSyracuse1123205660.8
2020 Regular SeasonSyracuse91063232.1
2021 Regular SeasonKent State7521024.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Syracuse paired 205 primary output with 59.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 25 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Syracuse, Kent State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Akron

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Kent State

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

3

Efficiency

25

Usage

9.1

Consistency

31.7

Best Game by takeover score

Akron

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 0. Bowling Green: 2. Western Michigan: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Central Michigan: 5. Akron: 12. Miami (OH): 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 1 by 13.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Akron: 2 by 40. Miami (OH): 1 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4 · Games = 4 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 3 · -2.3 vs Wins