Usage Score
9.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018Toledo
DT • 6'3" • 280 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Reggie Howard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.8
Efficiency
32.3
Consistency
63.9
Season Value
36.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reggie Howard, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Toledo. Reggie Howard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Toledo paired 18 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
32.3
Usage
9.8
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 0. Unknown: 2. Miami: 0. Nevada: 2. Fresno State: 1. Bowling Green: 0.5. Eastern Michigan: 2. Buffalo: 3.5. Western Michigan: 1. Ball State: 2. Kent State: 1.5. Central Michigan: 2.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 3 by 32.5. Miami: 8 by 33.3. Nevada: 5 by 40.8. Fresno State: 2 by 18.3. Bowling Green: 4 by 21.7. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 45. Buffalo: 5 by 55.8. Western Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Ball State: 3 by 32.5. Kent State: 2 by 23.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 45.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
55.8 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | vs Florida International | L 32-35 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | W 51-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 56-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Ball State | W 45-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Western Michigan | W 51-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs BuffaloSplash game | L 17-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Eastern MichiganSplash game | L 26-28 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-36 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Fresno State | L 27-49 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs NevadaSplash game | W 63-44 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Miami | L 24-49 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 5 | 11.8 | 5.3 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 5 | 11.8 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 18 | 32.3 | 9.8 | 13 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 18 | 32.3 | 9.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#3
Central Michigan
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42.4 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
#5
Nevada
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Toledo
18 primary output · 32.3 efficiency · 9.8 usage
36.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Toledo
36.3
18 primary · 32.3 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Toledo
10
5 primary · 11.8 efficiency · 5.3 usage
0
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8222
Withrow · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
69
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Reggie Howard quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit