Usage Score
23
Player Dossier
2018-2022Louisville
Justin Marshall
WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Conyers, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Justin Marshall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.9
Consistency
63
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Buffalo
18191920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Louisville • Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Marshall, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Buffalo. Justin Marshall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Buffalo paired 754 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisville, Buffalo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
62.8
Efficiency
78.9
Usage
23
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 127. Maryland: 52. Unknown: 116. Coastal Carolina: 88. Eastern Michigan: 45. Miami (OH): 52. Bowling Green: 43. Massachusetts: 75. Toledo: 26. Ohio: 72. Central Michigan: 45. Kent State: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 11 by 77. Maryland: 4 by 86.7. Unknown: 5 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 8 by 73.3. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 57.8. Bowling Green: 3 by 95.6. Massachusetts: 3 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 57.8. Ohio: 6 by 80. Central Michigan: 4 by 75. Kent State: 2 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Wins61.3 · n=6 · +7.3 vs Losses
Losses54 · n=5 · -7.3 vs Wins
First Half80 · n=6 · +34.3 vs Second Half
Second Half45.7 · n=6 · -34.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Georgia Southern100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-21 | — | 11 | 127 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Kent State | L 27-30 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Central Michigan | L 27-31 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Tue 11/1 | @ Ohio | L 24-45 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Toledo | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Massachusetts | W 34-7 | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Bowling Green | W 38-7 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Miami (OH) | W 24-20 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 50-31 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Coastal CarolinaHigh volume | L 26-38 | — | 8 | 88 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 116 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 2 | 69 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Maryland | L 10-31 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Buffalo
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisville | 135 | 89.3 | 8.2 | 135 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisville | 135 | 89.3 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisville | 87 | 78 | 7.1 | -48 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisville | 322 | 88.4 | 13.9 | 235 |
| 2022 Postseason | Buffalo | 754 | 78.9 | 23 | 432 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Buffalo | 754 | 78.9 | 23 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Southern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 77 efficiency score.
#2
NC State
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
59
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
116
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Buffalo
754 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 23 usage
66.2
#2
2022 Regular Season · Buffalo
66.2
754 primary · 78.9 efficiency · 23 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Louisville
56.3
322 primary · 88.4 efficiency · 13.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8792
Newton · Covington, GA
- Committed To
- Louisville
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,298
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.