Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2017-2020Clemson
WR • 5'10" • 210 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA
Amari Rodgers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.4
Efficiency
56.2
Consistency
27.6
Season Value
34.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amari Rodgers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson. Amari Rodgers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Clemson paired 1,020 primary output with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 56.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
32.8
Efficiency
56.2
Usage
11.4
Consistency
27.6
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 8. Ohio State: 38. Texas A&M: 6. Syracuse: 121. Charlotte: 0. North Carolina: 12. Florida State: 44. Louisville: 78. Boston College: 33. Unknown: 71. NC State: 7. Wake Forest: 0. South Carolina: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 2 by 26.7. Ohio State: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 2 by 20. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Charlotte: 1 by 0. North Carolina: 3 by 26.7. Florida State: 5 by 58.7. Louisville: 3 by 100. Boston College: 2 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. NC State: 3 by 15.6. South Carolina: 2 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/14 | @ LSU | L 25-42 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 12/29 | @ Ohio State | W 29-23 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ South Carolina | W 38-3 | — | 2 | 8 | 9.7 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wake Forest | W 52-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | @ NC State | W 55-10 | — | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 71 | 35.5 | 35.50 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Boston College | W 59-7 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisville | W 45-10 | — | 3 | 78 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Florida State | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 44 | 12.2 | 8.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ North Carolina | W 21-20 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Charlotte | W 52-10 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-6 | — | 4 | 121 | 30.3 | 30.30 | 2 | 87 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Texas A&M | W 24-10 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 123 | 47.9 | 7.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 123 | 47.9 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 575 | 55.9 | 18.3 | 452 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 575 | 55.9 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Clemson | 426 | 56.2 | 11.4 | -149 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 426 | 56.2 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 1,020 | 79.6 | 23.2 | 594 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,020 | 79.6 | 23.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Tech
161
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
134
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Clemson
1,020 primary output · 79.6 efficiency · 23.2 usage
68.3
#2
2020 Regular Season · Clemson
68.3
1,020 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Clemson
42.4
575 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 18.3 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9453
Knoxville Catholic · Knoxville, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,144
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Amari Rodgers quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit