Player Stats

Marcus Bennett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
863
Receptions
43
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonAir Force0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonAir Force0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonAir Force819398380
2018 Regular SeasonAir Force1024465390.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Air Force paired 465 primary output with 93 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 93 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Air Force

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

46.5

Efficiency

93

Usage

32.3

Consistency

70.4

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stony Brook: 25. Florida Atlantic: 87. Utah State: 74. Nevada: 52. UNLV: 44. Boise State: 20. Army: 44. New Mexico: 54. Wyoming: 31. Colorado State: 34

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stony Brook: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. Utah State: 5 by 98.7. Nevada: 4 by 86.7. UNLV: 2 by 100. Boise State: 1 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Wyoming: 3 by 68.9. Colorado State: 3 by 75.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins39.3 · Games = 4 · -12.1 vs Losses
Losses51.3 · Games = 6 · +12.1 vs Wins