Player Stats

Isaiah McDuffie College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
231
TFL
15.5
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonBoston College45-0-109.5
2017 Regular SeasonBoston College43-0--09.5
2018 Regular SeasonBoston College12865.53.522063.5
2019 PostseasonBoston College41010--062.5
2019 Regular SeasonBoston College4202.523-062.5
2020 Regular SeasonBoston College111076.534-071.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Boston College paired 14.5 primary output with 51.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 51.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

51.8

Usage

15.4

Consistency

34.4

Best Game by takeover score

Texas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 1. Texas State: 5. North Carolina: 4. Pittsburgh: 1.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Georgia Tech: 1. Clemson: 1. Syracuse: 0. Notre Dame: 1. Louisville: 0. Virginia: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 6 by 35. Texas State: 12 by 100. North Carolina: 12 by 90. Pittsburgh: 11 by 60.8. Virginia Tech: 11 by 45.8. Georgia Tech: 7 by 39.2. Clemson: 10 by 51.7. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 16 by 60. Louisville: 7 by 29.2. Virginia: 13 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Wins