Player Stats

Brontae Harris College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
73
TFL
9
Sacks
2
Passes defended
15
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonUAB81620-2228.9
2018 Regular SeasonUAB113141-10055.6
2019 Regular SeasonUAB00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonUAB82631-3035.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

UAB paired 17 primary output with 27.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 23.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · UAB

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

23.5

Usage

4.8

Consistency

33.3

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. South Alabama: 0. UTSA: 0. Western Kentucky: 3. Louisiana: 0. Louisiana Tech: 3. Rice: 1. Marshall: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 8.3. South Alabama: 4 by 16.7. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 5 by 50.8. Louisiana: 4 by 16.7. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 55. Rice: 1 by 14.2. Marshall: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins