Player Stats

Spencer Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,069
Rushing yards
3,959
Receiving yards
110
Touchdowns
41

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonUAB13633726079.4
2017 Regular SeasonUAB131,3081,292161079.4
2018 PostseasonUAB1422220075.4
2018 Regular SeasonUAB141,1691,152171675.4
2019 PostseasonUAB1239390051.5
2019 Regular SeasonUAB1254352716551.5
2020 Regular SeasonUAB8925890351073.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

UAB paired 1,371 primary output with 52.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 47.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · UAB

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

115.6

Efficiency

47.8

Usage

41.9

Consistency

79.6

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Arkansas: 135. Miami: 84. South Alabama: 107. UTSA: 160. Western Kentucky: 22. Louisiana: 128. Louisiana Tech: 140. Marshall: 149

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Arkansas: 25 by 55.6. Miami: 17 by 49.5. South Alabama: 22 by 51.8. UTSA: 28 by 58.4. Western Kentucky: 13 by 17.6. Louisiana: 28 by 47.6. Louisiana Tech: 29 by 50.3. Marshall: 30 by 51.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins114.6 · Games = 5 · -2.7 vs Losses
Losses117.3 · Games = 3 · +2.7 vs Wins