Usage Score
9.9
Player Dossier
2017-2019Louisiana Tech
CB • 5'9" • 183 lbs • Thibodaux, LA, USA
Amik Robertson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.9
Efficiency
45.8
Consistency
80.6
Season Value
45.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amik Robertson, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Amik Robertson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 30 primary output with 45.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 45.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
45.8
Usage
9.9
Consistency
80.6
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 2. Unknown: 2. Bowling Green: 3. Florida International: 3. Rice: 3. Massachusetts: 2. Southern Miss: 5. UTEP: 3. North Texas: 3. Marshall: 2. UAB: 1. UTSA: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 5 by 40.8. Bowling Green: 10 by 71.7. Florida International: 6 by 55. Rice: 7 by 59.2. Massachusetts: 4 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 3 by 62.5. UTEP: 4 by 46.7. North Texas: 2 by 38.3. Marshall: 5 by 40.8. UAB: 4 by 26.7. UTSA: 6 by 35
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
71.7 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTSA | W 41-27 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ UAB | L 14-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Marshall | L 10-31 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs North Texas | W 52-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 42-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Southern MissSplash game | W 45-30 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs MassachusettsSplash game | W 69-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Rice | W 23-20 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Florida International | W 43-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Bowling Green10+ tackles · Splash game | W 35-7 | 10 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Texas | L 14-45 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 20.5 | 35.7 | 14.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 20.5 | 35.7 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 23.5 | 40 | 7.5 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 23.5 | 40 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 30 | 45.8 | 9.9 | 6.5 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 76.9 takeover score.
#2
Western Kentucky
4.5
Primary metric
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.4 takeover score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.6 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
5
Primary metric
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#5
Southern Miss
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
30 primary output · 45.8 efficiency · 9.9 usage
45.3
#2
2018 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
36.1
23.5 primary · 40 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
36.1
23.5 primary · 40 efficiency · 7.5 usage
3
Impact games
10
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8894
Theodore · Theodore, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
176
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Amik Robertson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit