Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2018-2022Louisiana Tech
TE • 6'3" • 229 lbs • Lafayette, LA, USA
Griffin Hebert reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17
Efficiency
79
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
61.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Griffin Hebert, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. Griffin Hebert reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 537 primary output with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
61.6
Efficiency
79
Usage
17
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 93. Unknown: 63. Clemson: 122. South Alabama: 49. UTEP: 76. Middle Tennessee: 3. UTSA: 25
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Clemson: 5 by 100. South Alabama: 5 by 65.3. UTEP: 6 by 84.4. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 20. UTSA: 2 by 83.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 537 | 84.7 | 11.5 | 537 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 537 | 84.7 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 275 | 78.4 | 10.2 | -262 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 275 | 78.4 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 289 | 65.9 | 13.5 | 14 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 431 | 79 | 17 | 142 |
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
537 primary output · 84.7 efficiency · 11.5 usage
63
#2
2019 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
63
537 primary · 84.7 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
61.2
431 primary · 79 efficiency · 17 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7859
St. Thomas More · Lafayette, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,532
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Griffin Hebert quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit