Player Stats

Jaiden Cole College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
169
TFL
11
Sacks
6.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech45-0--037.8
2018 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech3710--012.7
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech618101-017.8
2020 PostseasonLouisiana Tech94-0--031
2020 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech9352.5211031
2021 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech11492.51--030
2022 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech95143.523073.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Louisiana Tech paired 13.5 primary output with 38.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 38.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

38.6

Usage

11.7

Consistency

57.5

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 0. Stephen F. Austin: 2. Clemson: 2. South Alabama: 2. UTEP: 3.5. North Texas: 0. Florida International: 3. Middle Tennessee: 0. UTSA: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 3 by 12.5. Stephen F. Austin: 6 by 45. Clemson: 6 by 45. South Alabama: 3 by 32.5. UTEP: 11 by 80.8. North Texas: 9 by 37.5. Florida International: 6 by 55. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 16.7. UTSA: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 3 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs Wins