Player Stats

Michael Warren II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,359
Rushing yards
2,917
Receiving yards
442
Touchdowns
37

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonCincinnati1238132457142.1
2018 PostseasonCincinnati1217616610286
2018 Regular SeasonCincinnati121,3841,1622221886
2019 PostseasonCincinnati14101105-4078.1
2019 Regular SeasonCincinnati141,3171,1601571678.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 1,560 primary output with 61.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 49.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Win with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

101.3

Efficiency

49.5

Usage

34.7

Consistency

72.8

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 101. UCLA: 119. Ohio State: 15. Miami (OH): 158. Marshall: 47. UCF: 152. Houston: 79. Tulsa: 35. East Carolina: 152. UConn: 60. South Florida: 164. Temple: 106. Memphis: 129. Memphis: 101

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 23 by 49.5. UCLA: 29 by 39.2. Ohio State: 10 by 15.6. Miami (OH): 17 by 88.7. Marshall: 14 by 34.2. UCF: 27 by 59.6. Houston: 18 by 43.3. Tulsa: 13 by 28. East Carolina: 19 by 82.3. UConn: 14 by 44.6. South Florida: 28 by 56.6. Temple: 24 by 46. Memphis: 22 by 60.7. Memphis: 24 by 44.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins106.6 · Games = 11 · +25.0 vs Losses
Losses81.7 · Games = 3 · -25.0 vs Wins