Usage Score
34.7
Player Dossier
2017-2019Cincinnati
Michael Warren II
RB • 5'11" • 222 lbs • Toledo, OH, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Michael Warren II leans workhorse runner traits and 49.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
49.5
Consistency
72.8
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
1718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Warren II, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati. Michael Warren II leans workhorse runner traits and 49.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 1,560 primary output with 61.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
101.3
Efficiency
49.5
Usage
34.7
Consistency
72.8
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 101. UCLA: 119. Ohio State: 15. Miami (OH): 158. Marshall: 47. UCF: 152. Houston: 79. Tulsa: 35. East Carolina: 152. UConn: 60. South Florida: 164. Temple: 106. Memphis: 129. Memphis: 101
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 23 by 49.5. UCLA: 29 by 39.2. Ohio State: 10 by 15.6. Miami (OH): 17 by 88.7. Marshall: 14 by 34.2. UCF: 27 by 59.6. Houston: 18 by 43.3. Tulsa: 13 by 28. East Carolina: 19 by 82.3. UConn: 14 by 44.6. South Florida: 28 by 56.6. Temple: 24 by 46. Memphis: 22 by 60.7. Memphis: 24 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Wins106.6 · n=11 · +25.0 vs Losses
Losses81.7 · n=3 · -25.0 vs Wins
First Half95.9 · n=7 · -10.9 vs Second Half
Second Half106.7 · n=7 · +10.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
88.7 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | vs Boston College100 rush yards | W 38-6 | 21 | 105 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 4.4 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Memphis2+ TD | L 24-29 | 23 | 99 | 4.30 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4.2 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Memphis100 rush yards | L 24-34 | 21 | 122 | 5.80 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5.9 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Temple100 rush yards | W 15-13 | 24 | 106 | 4.40 | 1 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ South Florida100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 20-17 | 26 | 134 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 5.9 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UConn2+ TD | W 48-3 | 14 | 60 | 4.30 | 2 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ East Carolina100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 46-43 | 18 | 141 | 7.80 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 8 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Tulsa | W 24-13 | 13 | 35 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Houston | W 38-23 | 17 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.4 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs UCF100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 27-24 | 23 | 133 | 5.80 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 5.6 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Marshall | W 52-14 | 13 | 42 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Miami (OH)100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-13 | 12 | 113 | 9.40 | 3 | 5 | 45 | 9.3 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ohio State | L 0-42 | 10 | 15 | 1.50 | 0 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs UCLA2+ TD | W 24-14 | 26 | 92 | 3.50 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 4.1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 381 | 56.3 | 9.4 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1,560 | 61.6 | 36 | 1,179 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,560 | 61.6 | 36 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1,418 | 49.5 | 34.7 | -142 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,418 | 49.5 | 34.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
176
Primary metric
176 scrimmage yards and 41.2 usage.
#2
East Carolina
152
Primary metric
Win with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
152 scrimmage yards and 37.3 usage.
#3
Miami (OH)
158
Primary metric
Win with 158 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
158 scrimmage yards and 27.4 usage.
#4
South Florida
164
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
164 scrimmage yards and 49.1 usage.
#5
South Florida
178
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
178 scrimmage yards and 43.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
1,560 primary output · 61.6 efficiency · 36 usage
70
#2
2018 Regular Season · Cincinnati
70
1,560 primary · 61.6 efficiency · 36 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
64.2
1,418 primary · 49.5 efficiency · 34.7 usage
Milestones
18
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
12
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9073
Frisco Emerson · McKinney, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,359
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.