Player Stats

Jahad Woods College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
399
TFL
35.5
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonWashington State123-0--054.7
2017 Regular SeasonWashington State1254101.5--054.7
2018 Regular SeasonWashington State11613321039.4
2019 PostseasonWashington State1320-0--073.7
2019 Regular SeasonWashington State1312110343073.7
2020 Regular SeasonWashington State43151-2062.2
2021 PostseasonWashington State1391.50--051.7
2021 Regular SeasonWashington State1310060-2051.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Washington State paired 21 primary output with 58.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 41.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Washington State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

41.4

Usage

9.8

Consistency

33.5

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 1.5. Utah State: 0.5. Portland State: 1. USC: 2. Utah: 0.5. California: 0.5. Oregon State: 0. Stanford: 0. BYU: 1. Arizona State: 0. Oregon: 0. Arizona: 3.5. Washington: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 9 by 52.5. Utah State: 13 by 55. Portland State: 5 by 30.8. USC: 5 by 40.8. Utah: 9 by 42.5. California: 7 by 34.2. Oregon State: 5 by 20.8. Stanford: 1 by 4.2. BYU: 16 by 60. Arizona State: 11 by 45.8. Oregon: 12 by 50. Arizona: 12 by 85. Washington: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 7 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Wins