Usage Score
19.3
Player Dossier
2016-2020Washington State
Brandon Arconado
WR • 6'0" • 193 lbs • Chino Hills, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brandon Arconado reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.2
Consistency
73.1
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Washington State
16171718191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Arconado, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Washington State. Brandon Arconado reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Washington State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Washington State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
100.8
Efficiency
88.2
Usage
19.3
Consistency
73.1
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 167. New Mexico State: 66. Unknown: 127. Houston: 115. UCLA: 44. Colorado: 109. Oregon: 130. California: 130. Stanford: 148. Oregon State: 39. Washington: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 11 by 100. New Mexico State: 6 by 73.3. Unknown: 8 by 100. Houston: 9 by 85.2. UCLA: 2 by 100. Colorado: 5 by 100. Oregon: 9 by 96.3. California: 12 by 72.2. Stanford: 9 by 100. Oregon State: 3 by 86.7. Washington: 4 by 56.7
Split Comparison
Wins95.4 · n=5 · -5.6 vs Losses
Losses101 · n=5 · +5.6 vs Wins
First Half104.7 · n=6 · +8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half96.2 · n=5 · -8.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-31 | — | 11 | 167 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 1 | 30 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Washington | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Oregon State | W 54-53 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-22 | — | 9 | 148 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 44 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ California100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-33 | — | 12 | 130 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-37 | — | 9 | 130 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Colorado100 receiving yards | W 41-10 | — | 5 | 109 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 44 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UCLA | L 63-67 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 9 | 115 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 127 | 15.9 | 15.90 | 1 | 39 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs New Mexico State | W 58-7 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Washington State | 73 | 86.7 | 3 | 73 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington State | 73 | 86.7 | 3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | -73 |
| 2019 Postseason | Washington State | 1,109 | 88.2 | 19.3 | 1,109 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Washington State | 1,109 | 88.2 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | -1,109 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
167
Primary metric
167 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
148
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 96.3 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
127
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Washington State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2019 Postseason · Washington State
70.2
1,109 primary · 88.2 efficiency · 19.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Washington State
70.2
1,109 primary · 88.2 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,182
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.