Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Washington State
Dezmon Patmon
WR • 6'4" • 228 lbs • San Diego, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dezmon Patmon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.5
Consistency
77.3
Season Value
67.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Washington State
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dezmon Patmon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Washington State. Dezmon Patmon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Washington State paired 762 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Washington State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
58.6
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
11.6
Consistency
77.3
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 22. New Mexico State: 103. Unknown: 72. Houston: 52. UCLA: 63. Utah: 62. Arizona State: 97. Colorado: 32. Oregon: 56. California: 23. Stanford: 54. Oregon State: 75. Washington: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 3 by 48.9. New Mexico State: 7 by 98.1. Unknown: 4 by 100. Houston: 2 by 100. UCLA: 4 by 100. Utah: 5 by 82.7. Arizona State: 6 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 71.1. Oregon: 5 by 74.7. California: 2 by 76.7. Stanford: 5 by 72. Oregon State: 5 by 100. Washington: 7 by 48.6
Split Comparison
Wins63.2 · n=5 · +9.8 vs Losses
Losses53.4 · n=7 · -9.8 vs Wins
First Half67.3 · n=7 · +18.8 vs Second Half
Second Half48.5 · n=6 · -18.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Air Force | L 21-31 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Washington | L 13-31 | — | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Oregon State2+ TD | W 54-53 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Stanford | W 49-22 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ California | L 20-33 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Oregon | L 35-37 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Colorado | W 41-10 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Arizona State | L 34-38 | — | 6 | 97 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 29 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Utah | L 13-38 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UCLA | L 63-67 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Houston | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs New Mexico State100 receiving yards | W 58-7 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 48 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington State | 19 | 63.3 | 7.4 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Washington State | 379 | 65 | 10.8 | 360 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington State | 379 | 65 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Washington State | 816 | 79.2 | 12.4 | 437 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington State | 816 | 79.2 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Washington State | 762 | 82.5 | 11.6 | -54 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Washington State | 762 | 82.5 | 11.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 84.7 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Washington State
762 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 11.6 usage
67.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Washington State
67.9
762 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Washington State
64.1
816 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8478
Lawrence Central · Indianapolis, IN
- Committed To
- Virginia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,976
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.