Usage Score
23.6
Player Dossier
2017-2020Louisiana Tech
Adrian Hardy
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Adrian Hardy reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.7
Consistency
72.2
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
17171818191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adrian Hardy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. Adrian Hardy reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 1,146 primary output with 93.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
62.9
Efficiency
86.7
Usage
23.6
Consistency
72.2
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 79. Unknown: 69. BYU: 0. UTEP: 58. Marshall: 102. UTSA: 31. UAB: 101
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. UTEP: 4 by 96.7. Marshall: 9 by 75.6. UTSA: 4 by 51.7. UAB: 7 by 96.2
Split Comparison
Wins79.3 · n=3 · +35.0 vs Losses
Losses44.3 · n=3 · -35.0 vs Wins
First Half51.5 · n=4 · -26.5 vs Second Half
Second Half78 · n=3 · +26.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/31 | vs UAB100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 37-34 | — | 7 | 101 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 2 | 31 |
| Sun 10/25 | @ UTSA | L 26-27 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-35 | — | 9 | 102 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs UTEP | W 21-17 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ BYU | L 14-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Southern Miss | W 31-30 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 251 | 87.7 | 15.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 251 | 87.7 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1,146 | 93.6 | 26 | 895 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1,146 | 93.6 | 26 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 534 | 79.1 | 18.3 | -612 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 534 | 79.1 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 440 | 86.7 | 23.6 | -94 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
182
Primary metric
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
160
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 77 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
1,146 primary output · 93.6 efficiency · 26 usage
72.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
72.6
1,146 primary · 93.6 efficiency · 26 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
56
440 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 23.6 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.855
Keller Central · Keller, TX
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,371
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.