Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2016-2017Kent State
RB • 6'0" • 221 lbs • Washington, DC, USA
Keon Singleton leans balanced backfield option traits and 17 efficiency.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
3
Developing production for a back
Reliability
2
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
15
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Kent State
Snapshot
Keon Singleton, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Kent State. Keon Singleton leans balanced backfield option traits and 17 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 3 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 46.9 |
Related Context
Keon Singleton played RB for Kent State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Keon Singleton recorded 17 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Kent State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Kent State paired 17 primary output with 17 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 17 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Loss with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
5.7
Efficiency
17
Usage
5.1
Consistency
56
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 5. Louisville: 12. Bowling Green: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 26. Louisville: 5 by 25. Bowling Green: 1 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
26 vs Clemson
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kent State
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 17 | 17 | 5.1 | 17 |
#1 Featured game
@ Louisville
Week 4 · L 3-42
Loss with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12
Scrimmage Yards
50.1 takeover
12 scrimmage yards and 8.9 usage.
#2
@ Clemson
Week 1 · L 3-56
5
Scrimmage Yards
26.8 takeover
Loss with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 4.4 usage.
#3
vs Bowling Green
Week 10 · L 16-44 · Conference game
0
Scrimmage Yards
2 takeover
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Kent State
17 primary output · 17 efficiency · 5.1 usage
46.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Kent State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.