Player Stats

Anthony Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,367
Receptions
133
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonBuffalo0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonBuffalo0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonBuffalo12761,3561490.8
2018 PostseasonBuffalo12567079.5
2018 Regular SeasonBuffalo12529441179.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Buffalo paired 1,356 primary output with 93.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 87.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Buffalo

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

84.3

Efficiency

87.7

Usage

28.4

Consistency

61

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 67. Delaware State: 57. Temple: 76. Eastern Michigan: 74. Rutgers: 101. Akron: 44. Toledo: 83. Miami (OH): 238. Kent State: 26. Ohio: 95. Bowling Green: 26. Northern Illinois: 124

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 5 by 89.3. Delaware State: 4 by 95. Temple: 6 by 84.4. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 82.2. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Akron: 2 by 100. Toledo: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 57.8. Ohio: 6 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 43.3. Northern Illinois: 7 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins80.6 · Games = 9 · -14.8 vs Losses
Losses95.3 · Games = 3 · +14.8 vs Wins