Usage Score
28.4
Player Dossier
2015-2018Buffalo
Anthony Johnson
WR • 6'2" • 207 lbs • Rock Hill, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Anthony Johnson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.7
Consistency
61
Season Value
62.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
1516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Buffalo. Anthony Johnson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 1,356 primary output with 93.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
84.3
Efficiency
87.7
Usage
28.4
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 67. Unknown: 57. Temple: 76. Eastern Michigan: 74. Rutgers: 101. Akron: 44. Toledo: 83. Miami (OH): 238. Kent State: 26. Ohio: 95. Bowling Green: 26. Northern Illinois: 124
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 5 by 89.3. Unknown: 4 by 95. Temple: 6 by 84.4. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 82.2. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Akron: 2 by 100. Toledo: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 57.8. Ohio: 6 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 43.3. Northern Illinois: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins83.5 · n=8 · -11.8 vs Losses
Losses95.3 · n=3 · +11.8 vs Wins
First Half69.8 · n=6 · -28.8 vs Second Half
Second Half98.7 · n=6 · +28.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/23 | @ Troy | L 32-42 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 29-30 | — | 7 | 124 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 2 | 36 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-14 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Ohio | L 17-52 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 48 |
| Wed 11/7 | vs Kent State | W 48-14 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-42 | — | 8 | 238 | 29.8 | 29.80 | 3 | 75 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Toledo2+ TD | W 31-17 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Akron | W 24-6 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 42-13 | — | 2 | 101 | 50.5 | 50.50 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 35-28 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Temple | W 36-29 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,356 | 93.7 | 33.1 | 1,356 |
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 1,011 | 87.7 | 28.4 | -345 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,011 | 87.7 | 28.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
238
Primary metric
238 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
195
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
195 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
153
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
160
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
155
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
1,356 primary output · 93.7 efficiency · 33.1 usage
73.9
#2
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
62.8
1,011 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 28.4 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
62.8
1,011 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 28.4 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,367
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.