Usage Score
42.9
Player Dossier
2017-2020Buffalo
Antonio Nunn
WR • 5'11" • 200 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Antonio Nunn reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.1
Consistency
62.3
Season Value
72
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Buffalo
17181819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Nunn, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Buffalo. Antonio Nunn reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Buffalo paired 687 primary output with 83.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
96.5
Efficiency
92.1
Usage
42.9
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 49. Northern Illinois: 102. Miami (OH): 137. Bowling Green: 70. Kent State: 39. Ball State: 182
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 4 by 81.7. Northern Illinois: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 5 by 100. Bowling Green: 6 by 77.8. Kent State: 2 by 100. Ball State: 13 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins79.4 · n=5
First Half96 · n=3 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half97 · n=3 · +1 vs First Half
All Games96.5 · n=6
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs Marshall | W 17-10 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 12/19 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-38 | — | 13 | 182 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Kent State | W 70-41 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Wed 11/18 | @ Bowling Green | W 42-17 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Wed 11/11 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards | W 42-10 | — | 5 | 137 | 27.4 | 27.40 | 1 | 82 |
| Thu 11/5 | @ Northern Illinois100 receiving yards | W 49-30 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 301 | 78.2 | 11 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 146 | 59.1 | 10.2 | -155 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 146 | 59.1 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Buffalo | 687 | 83.4 | 34.8 | 541 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Buffalo | 687 | 83.4 | 34.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Buffalo | 579 | 92.1 | 42.9 | -108 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Buffalo | 579 | 92.1 | 42.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
182
Primary metric
182 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Buffalo
687 primary output · 83.4 efficiency · 34.8 usage
72
#2
2019 Regular Season · Buffalo
72
687 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 34.8 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Buffalo
72
579 primary · 92.1 efficiency · 42.9 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7733
Jefferson · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,713
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.