Player Stats

Cassh Maluia College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
191
TFL
16.5
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonWyoming63-0--042.7
2016 Regular SeasonWyoming613-0--042.7
2017 PostseasonWyoming12410--037.4
2017 Regular SeasonWyoming12642.51-1037.4
2018 Regular SeasonWyoming11466013058.1
2019 PostseasonWyoming134-0--064
2019 Regular SeasonWyoming135770.511064

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Wyoming paired 11.5 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Air Force

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Wyoming

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

28.4

Usage

9

Consistency

52.3

Best Game by takeover score

Air Force

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 0. Missouri: 1. Texas State: 1. Idaho: 1. Tulsa: 1.5. UNLV: 1. San Diego State: 0. New Mexico: 0.5. Nevada: 0. Boise State: 0.5. Utah State: 2. Colorado State: 0. Air Force: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia State: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 4 by 26.7. Texas State: 1 by 14.2. Idaho: 5 by 30.8. Tulsa: 4 by 31.7. UNLV: 2 by 18.3. San Diego State: 9 by 37.5. New Mexico: 3 by 17.5. Nevada: 5 by 20.8. Boise State: 7 by 34.2. Utah State: 7 by 49.2. Colorado State: 4 by 16.7. Air Force: 6 by 55

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 8 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs Wins