Player Stats

Garrett Crall College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
188
TFL
27
Sacks
16
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonWyoming11310--043.9
2017 Regular SeasonWyoming11274.52.5-2043.9
2018 Regular SeasonWyoming11386.54.521070.4
2019 PostseasonWyoming133-0--057.4
2019 Regular SeasonWyoming135264.542057.4
2020 Regular SeasonWyoming32132-1061.8
2021 PostseasonWyoming1331.51.5--058.1
2021 Regular SeasonWyoming13414.5142058.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Wyoming paired 14 primary output with 27.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 25.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Wyoming

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

25.3

Usage

8

Consistency

53

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 3. Montana State: 1. Northern Illinois: 1. Ball State: 0. UConn: 4. Air Force: 0. Fresno State: 0. New Mexico: 1. San José State: 1.5. Colorado State: 1. Boise State: 1. Utah State: 1. Hawai'i: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 3 by 42.5. Montana State: 5 by 30.8. Northern Illinois: 1 by 14.2. Ball State: 3 by 12.5. UConn: 5 by 60.8. Air Force: 7 by 29.2. Fresno State: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico: 9 by 47.5. San José State: 3 by 27.5. Colorado State: 0 by 10. Boise State: 3 by 22.5. Utah State: 3 by 22.5. Hawai'i: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 7 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 6 · -1.0 vs Wins