Player Stats

Curtis Weaver College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
126
TFL
46.5
Sacks
33
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonBoise State14322--064.2
2017 Regular SeasonBoise State143011912064.2
2018 Regular SeasonBoise State1141148.511064
2019 PostseasonBoise State142-0--073.8
2019 Regular SeasonBoise State145019.513.543073.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Boise State paired 41 primary output with 41.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 41.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Portland State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Boise State

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

2.9

Efficiency

41.2

Usage

16.8

Consistency

54.2

Best Game by takeover score

Portland State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 0. Florida State: 2.5. Marshall: 2.5. Portland State: 9. Air Force: 0. UNLV: 6. Hawai'i: 2. BYU: 2. San José State: 5. Wyoming: 4. New Mexico: 1. Utah State: 3. Colorado State: 2.5. Hawai'i: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 2 by 8.3. Florida State: 3 by 37.5. Marshall: 6 by 50. Portland State: 6 by 75. Air Force: 2 by 8.3. UNLV: 6 by 75. Hawai'i: 3 by 32.5. BYU: 5 by 40.8. San José State: 4 by 66.7. Wyoming: 5 by 60.8. New Mexico: 2 by 18.3. Utah State: 2 by 38.3. Colorado State: 3 by 37.5. Hawai'i: 3 by 27.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.3 · Games = 12 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · -2.3 vs Wins