Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2017-2021Utah
WR • 6'3" • 195 lbs • Provo, UT, USA
Samson Nacua reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.1
Efficiency
75.8
Consistency
34.1
Season Value
52.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Samson Nacua, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Utah. Samson Nacua reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Utah paired 362 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, BYU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
29.9
Efficiency
75.8
Usage
11.1
Consistency
34.1
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 41. Utah: 10. Arizona State: 11. South Florida: 0. Utah State: 17. Boise State: 14. Washington State: 7. Virginia: 107. Unknown: 28. Georgia Southern: 68. USC: 26
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 3 by 91.1. Utah: 2 by 33.3. Arizona State: 1 by 73.3. Utah State: 1 by 100. Boise State: 1 by 93.3. Washington State: 1 by 46.7. Virginia: 3 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 62.2. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. USC: 3 by 57.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Southern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs UAB | L 28-31 | — | 3 | 41 | 10.8 | 13.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/28 | @ USC | W 35-31 | — | 3 | 26 | 7.8 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Georgia Southern | W 34-17 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 28 | 8 | 9.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/31 | vs Virginia100 receiving yards | W 66-49 | — | 3 | 107 | 28.5 | 35.70 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Washington State | W 21-19 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Boise State | L 17-26 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Utah State | W 34-20 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs South Florida | W 35-27 | — | — | — | 1.5 | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/19 | vs Arizona State | W 27-17 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Utah | W 26-17 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2017-2020
Opening stop
BYU
2021
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Utah | 294 | 73.4 | 13.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 294 | 73.4 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah | 362 | 70.1 | 14.1 | 68 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah | 362 | 70.1 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah | 324 | 77.8 | 11.3 | -38 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah | 324 | 77.8 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Utah | 29 | 32.2 | 10.2 | -295 |
| 2021 Postseason | BYU | 329 | 75.8 | 11.1 | 300 |
| 2021 Regular Season | BYU | 329 | 75.8 | 11.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68
Primary metric
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCLA
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Utah
362 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 14.1 usage
56.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Utah
56.5
362 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Utah
56.1
324 primary · 77.8 efficiency · 11.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.85
Ridge View · Columbia, SC
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,338
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Samson Nacua quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit