Usage Score
0
Player Dossier
2016-2020Ole Miss
D'Vaughn Pennamon
TE • 5'11" • 230 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
D'Vaughn Pennamon reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
1617181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D'Vaughn Pennamon, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss. D'Vaughn Pennamon reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
— vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/9 | vs New Mexico State | W 41-3 | — | — | — | 1.7 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 20 | 66.7 | 4.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 84 | 38.7 | 5.2 | 64 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | -84 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
50
Primary metric
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
South Alabama
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 31.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ole Miss
22.9
20 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Ole Miss
22.3
84 primary · 38.7 efficiency · 5.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9122
Manvel · Manvel, TX
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
104
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.