Usage Score
32.8
Player Dossier
2016-2018Ole Miss
A.J. Brown
WR • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Starkville, MS, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
A.J. Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.3
Consistency
76.9
Season Value
74.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss. A.J. Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 1,355 primary output with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
112.9
Efficiency
88.3
Usage
32.8
Consistency
76.9
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 93. Unknown: 158. Alabama: 34. Kent State: 96. LSU: 72. UL Monroe: 133. Arkansas: 64. Auburn: 149. South Carolina: 115. Texas A&M: 127. Vanderbilt: 212. Mississippi State: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 7 by 88.6. Unknown: 8 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 56.7. Kent State: 7 by 91.4. LSU: 9 by 53.3. UL Monroe: 9 by 98.5. Arkansas: 6 by 71.1. Auburn: 9 by 100. South Carolina: 6 by 100. Texas A&M: 6 by 100. Vanderbilt: 9 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins96.5 · n=4 · -19.4 vs Losses
Losses115.9 · n=7 · +19.4 vs Wins
First Half97.7 · n=6 · -30.5 vs Second Half
Second Half128.2 · n=6 · +30.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards | L 3-35 | — | 5 | 102 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | L 29-36 | — | 9 | 212 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 1 | 84 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards | L 24-38 | — | 6 | 127 | 21.2 | 21.20 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards | L 44-48 | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 16-31 | — | 9 | 149 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Arkansas | W 37-33 | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UL Monroe100 receiving yards · High volume | W 70-21 | — | 9 | 133 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 9/30 | @ LSUHigh volume | L 16-45 | — | 9 | 72 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Kent State | W 38-17 | — | 7 | 96 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Alabama | L 7-62 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 158 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 47-27 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 412 | 81.1 | 10.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,252 | 81.3 | 29.9 | 840 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,355 | 88.3 | 32.8 | 103 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
167
Primary metric
167 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Alabama
233
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
233 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
212
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
212 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana
185
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
185 receiving yards with a 88.1 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
1,355 primary output · 88.3 efficiency · 32.8 usage
74.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Ole Miss
66.5
1,252 primary · 81.3 efficiency · 29.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Ole Miss
48.4
412 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9803
Starkville · Starkville, MS
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,019
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.