Player Stats

Josh Jacobs College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,069
Rushing yards
1,488
Receiving yards
581
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 PostseasonAlabama141316-3056.2
2016 Regular SeasonAlabama14717548169656.2
2017 PostseasonAlabama111183045.4
2017 Regular SeasonAlabama11441276165345.4
2018 PostseasonAlabama1522114576164.8
2018 Regular SeasonAlabama156664951711564.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Alabama paired 887 primary output with 56 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 56 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma

Win with 158 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Alabama

Games

15

Scrimmage Yards / G

59.1

Efficiency

56

Usage

15.7

Consistency

58.2

Best Game by takeover score

Oklahoma

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 63. Oklahoma: 158. Louisville: 45. Arkansas State: 37. Ole Miss: 36. Texas A&M: 36. Louisiana: 49. Arkansas: 10. Missouri: 52. Tennessee: 70. LSU: 40. Mississippi State: 109. The Citadel: 18. Auburn: 81. Georgia: 83

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 12 by 48.6. Oklahoma: 19 by 75.5. Louisville: 6 by 78.1. Arkansas State: 8 by 36.8. Ole Miss: 7 by 40.2. Texas A&M: 7 by 32.9. Louisiana: 6 by 84. Arkansas: 5 by 20.8. Missouri: 9 by 60.2. Tennessee: 13 by 57.9. LSU: 6 by 54.3. Mississippi State: 22 by 51. The Citadel: 3 by 34.4. Auburn: 9 by 72.5. Georgia: 8 by 93.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins58.9 · Games = 14 · -4.1 vs Losses
Losses63 · Games = 1 · +4.1 vs Wins