Player Stats

Rakeem Boyd College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,534
Rushing yards
2,176
Receiving yards
358
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTexas A&M00000-
2017 Regular SeasonArkansas00000-
2018 Regular SeasonArkansas12899734165264.2
2019 Regular SeasonArkansas121,2931,133160885.1
2020 Regular SeasonArkansas634230933353

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Arkansas paired 1,293 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 38 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Arkansas.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M

Loss with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Arkansas

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

57

Efficiency

38

Usage

26.5

Consistency

71.6

Best Game by takeover score

Texas A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 29. Mississippi State: 28. Ole Miss: 46. Texas A&M: 109. Tennessee: 64. Florida: 66

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 15 by 20. Mississippi State: 8 by 36.5. Ole Miss: 16 by 29.4. Texas A&M: 19 by 58.6. Tennessee: 20 by 34.7. Florida: 14 by 48.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins46 · Games = 3 · -22 vs Losses
Losses68 · Games = 3 · +22 vs Wins