Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2016-2020Texas A&M
RB • 6'0" • 206 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Rakeem Boyd leans balanced backfield option traits and 38 efficiency.
Usage Score
26.5
Efficiency
38
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
40.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rakeem Boyd, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Arkansas. Rakeem Boyd leans balanced backfield option traits and 38 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 1,293 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Arkansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
57
Efficiency
38
Usage
26.5
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 29. Mississippi State: 28. Ole Miss: 46. Texas A&M: 109. Tennessee: 64. Florida: 66
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 15 by 20. Mississippi State: 8 by 36.5. Ole Miss: 16 by 29.4. Texas A&M: 19 by 58.6. Tennessee: 20 by 34.7. Florida: 14 by 48.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
58.6 vs Texas A&M
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2016
Opening stop
Arkansas
2017-2020
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arkansas | 899 | 53.4 | 23.2 | 899 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arkansas | 1,293 | 60.3 | 35.2 | 394 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Arkansas | 342 | 38 | 26.5 | -951 |
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with 185 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
185
Primary metric
185 scrimmage yards and 21.6 usage.
#2
Ole Miss
145
Primary metric
Loss with 145 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
145 scrimmage yards and 14.3 usage.
#3
Kentucky
134
Primary metric
Loss with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 35.7 usage.
#4
Alabama
126
Primary metric
Loss with 126 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
126 scrimmage yards and 35.1 usage.
#5
Texas A&M
109
Primary metric
Loss with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 29.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Arkansas
1,293 primary output · 60.3 efficiency · 35.2 usage
68.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Arkansas
53.3
899 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Arkansas
40.6
342 primary · 38 efficiency · 26.5 usage
13
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8783
Stratford · Houston, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,534
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Rakeem Boyd quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit