Player Stats

Ke'Mon Freeman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,295
Rushing yards
2,016
Receiving yards
279
Touchdowns
29

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonSMU12810651159669.5
2017 PostseasonSMU1316160057.2
2017 Regular SeasonSMU13555527281157.2
2018 Regular SeasonSMU839433955644.8
2019 PostseasonSMU1318180151.2
2019 Regular SeasonSMU1350246537551.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

SMU paired 810 primary output with 46.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Loss with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · SMU

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

40

Efficiency

46.6

Usage

15.1

Consistency

51.1

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 18. Arkansas State: 86. North Texas: 31. Texas State: 67. TCU: 27. South Florida: 9. Tulsa: 14. Temple: 15. Houston: 61. Memphis: 93. East Carolina: 54. Navy: 8. Tulane: 37

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 15 by 12.5. Arkansas State: 22 by 40.7. North Texas: 13 by 27.6. Texas State: 14 by 49.9. TCU: 10 by 28.1. South Florida: 1 by 87.5. Tulsa: 11 by 13.3. Temple: 6 by 31.7. Houston: 7 by 85.3. Memphis: 8 by 98.4. East Carolina: 9 by 60.2. Navy: 3 by 27.8. Tulane: 9 by 42.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins40.1 · Games = 10 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses39.7 · Games = 3 · -0.4 vs Wins