Usage Score
0.8
Player Dossier
2016-2016Michigan State
Auston Robertson
DE • 6'4" • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Auston Robertson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
4.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
16
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Auston Robertson, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Michigan State. Auston Robertson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.8
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 0. Penn State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Penn State: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0 · Games = 3
First Half0 · Games = 2
All Games0 · Games = 3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Penn State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#2
Ohio State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9521
Wayne · Fort Wayne, IN
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
3
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.