Player Stats

Adetokunbo Ogundeji College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
80
TFL
17
Sacks
13
QB hurries
13
Passes defended
1
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonNotre Dame00-0--0-
2017 Regular SeasonNotre Dame00-0--0-
2018 PostseasonNotre Dame103111-028.2
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame102020.511028.2
2019 PostseasonNotre Dame122111-052.5
2019 Regular SeasonNotre Dame123263.54-152.5
2020 PostseasonNotre Dame1110.50.5--062.1
2020 Regular SeasonNotre Dame11226.56.56-062.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 20 primary output with 26.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

26.9

Usage

10.1

Consistency

36.9

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 1. Duke: 1. South Florida: 0. Florida State: 5. Pittsburgh: 1. Georgia Tech: 2. Clemson: 1. Boston College: 1. North Carolina: 4. Syracuse: 1. Clemson: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 1 by 14.2. Duke: 2 by 18.3. South Florida: 1 by 4.2. Florida State: 4 by 66.7. Pittsburgh: 0 by 10. Georgia Tech: 4 by 36.7. Clemson: 1 by 14.2. Boston College: 2 by 18.3. North Carolina: 3 by 52.5. Syracuse: 3 by 22.5. Clemson: 2 by 38.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 9 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 2 · +0.2 vs Wins