Usage Score
26.4
Player Dossier
2016-2019Notre Dame
Chase Claypool
WR • 6'4" • 229 lbs • Abbotsford, BC, CAN
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Chase Claypool reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.4
Consistency
65.1
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Claypool, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Notre Dame. Chase Claypool reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 1,037 primary output with 89.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 89.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
79.8
Efficiency
89.4
Usage
26.4
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 146. Louisville: 94. New Mexico: 96. Georgia: 66. Virginia: 30. Bowling Green: 61. USC: 47. Michigan: 42. Virginia Tech: 118. Duke: 97. Navy: 117. Boston College: 60. Stanford: 63
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 7 by 100. Louisville: 5 by 100. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Georgia: 6 by 73.3. Virginia: 6 by 33.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. USC: 3 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 100. Virginia Tech: 8 by 98.3. Duke: 5 by 100. Navy: 7 by 100. Boston College: 7 by 57.1. Stanford: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins84.5 · n=11 · +30.5 vs Losses
Losses54 · n=2 · -30.5 vs Wins
First Half77.1 · n=7 · -5.7 vs Second Half
Second Half82.8 · n=6 · +5.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards | W 33-9 | — | 7 | 146 | 20.9 | 20.90 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Stanford2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 3 | 63 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 41 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Boston College | W 40-7 | — | 7 | 60 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-20 | — | 7 | 117 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 4 | 47 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Duke | W 38-7 | — | 5 | 97 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Virginia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 21-20 | — | 8 | 118 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Michigan | L 14-45 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs USC | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Bowling Green2+ TD | W 52-0 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Virginia | W 35-20 | — | 6 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Georgia | L 17-23 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs New Mexico | W 66-14 | — | 4 | 96 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 37 |
| Tue 9/3 | @ Louisville | W 35-17 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 81 | 77.3 | 5.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 402 | 75.8 | 18.8 | 321 |
| 2018 Postseason | Notre Dame | 639 | 78.5 | 18.1 | 237 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 639 | 78.5 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Notre Dame | 1,037 | 89.4 | 26.4 | 398 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 1,037 | 89.4 | 26.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa State
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia Tech
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
1,037 primary output · 89.4 efficiency · 26.4 usage
70.2
#2
2019 Regular Season · Notre Dame
70.2
1,037 primary · 89.4 efficiency · 26.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
56.7
639 primary · 78.5 efficiency · 18.1 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9284
Abbotsford · Abbotsford, BC
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,159
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.