Usage Score
3.4
Player Dossier
2016-2019Notre Dame
Troy Pride Jr.
CB • 5'11" • 194 lbs • Greer, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Troy Pride Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.7
Consistency
57.9
Season Value
24.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Pride Jr., CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Troy Pride Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 0 primary output with 10 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 19.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
19.7
Usage
3.4
Consistency
57.9
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 1. Louisville: 0. New Mexico: 1. Georgia: 0. Virginia: 1. Bowling Green: 0. USC: 1. Michigan: 1. Virginia Tech: 1. Duke: 1. Navy: 0. Stanford: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 3 by 22.5. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. New Mexico: 0 by 10. Georgia: 2 by 8.3. Virginia: 6 by 35. Bowling Green: 2 by 8.3. USC: 5 by 30.8. Michigan: 4 by 26.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 30.8. Duke: 6 by 35. Navy: 1 by 4.2. Stanford: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 10 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
35 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Iowa State | W 33-9 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Stanford | W 45-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Navy | W 52-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Duke | W 38-7 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Virginia Tech | W 21-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Michigan | L 14-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs USC | W 30-27 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Virginia | W 35-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Georgia | L 17-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs New Mexico | W 66-14 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Tue 9/3 | @ Louisville | W 35-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | 10 | 1.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 4 | 17.6 | 6.6 | 4 |
| 2018 Postseason | Notre Dame | 13.5 | 29.7 | 5.1 | 9.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 13.5 | 29.7 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Notre Dame | 7 | 19.7 | 3.4 | -6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 7 | 19.7 | 3.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.9 takeover score.
#2
Navy
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.8 takeover score.
#3
Duke
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#4
Virginia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#5
Virginia Tech
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
0 primary output · 10 efficiency · 1.8 usage
37.3
#2
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
30.3
13.5 primary · 29.7 efficiency · 5.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame
30.3
13.5 primary · 29.7 efficiency · 5.1 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9113
Greer · Greer, SC
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
118
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.