Player Stats

Tony Jones Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,754
Rushing yards
1,481
Receiving yards
273
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonNotre Dame12-10-1034.6
2017 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1224523213334.6
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame12549392157446.2
2019 PostseasonNotre Dame121361351171.7
2019 Regular SeasonNotre Dame12825722103671.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 961 primary output with 53.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 53.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

80.1

Efficiency

53.6

Usage

24.1

Consistency

64.4

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 136. Louisville: 110. New Mexico: 23. Georgia: 45. Virginia: 137. Bowling Green: 102. USC: 176. Michigan: 23. Duke: 26. Navy: 26. Boston College: 67. Stanford: 90

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 13 by 93.6. Louisville: 15 by 76.4. New Mexico: 7 by 31.4. Georgia: 13 by 29. Virginia: 19 by 75.5. Bowling Green: 7 by 100. USC: 25 by 73.3. Michigan: 10 by 20.5. Duke: 9 by 24.5. Navy: 9 by 30.1. Boston College: 16 by 42.9. Stanford: 16 by 45.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins89.3 · Games = 10 · +55.3 vs Losses
Losses34 · Games = 2 · -55.3 vs Wins